Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amd!phil
From: phil@amd.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Pedestrian Rights
Message-ID: <1358@amd.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 26-May-85 01:40:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: amd.1358
Posted: Sun May 26 01:40:59 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 26-May-85 05:21:43 EDT
References: <786@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AMD Applications, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 13

In article <786@ssc-vax.UUCP>, randy@ssc-vax.UUCP (Yoda Necron) writes:
> The moral of this story is that one had better not hit a pedestrian
> in this state unless you have a very good lawyer.

In this state you can usually get away with hitting a pedestrian walking
on the freeway... Especially if you kill him, so he can't testify against
or sue you.
-- 
 Sex is not the answer. Sex is the question. Yes is the answer.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA