Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!greipa!pesnta!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcmt!ron
From: ron@hpfcmt.UUCP (ron)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Re: Airmans Physicals & Eye Sight
Message-ID: <16900007@hpfcmt.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-May-85 19:49:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfcmt.16900007
Posted: Wed May 15 19:49:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 03:25:09 EDT
References: <1566@druxv.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:druxv:-156600:hpfcmt:16900007:000:538
Nf-From: hpfcmt!ron    May 21 15:49:00 1985

Re: 2nd class and 1st class vision


Anybody got any idea why there is an UNcorrected standard at all ???

I've already thought about the idea of "What if your glasses fall off ?"
and discarded that because it could be easily overcome by a restriction
stating that a 2nd pair be accessible. (Also note that in 23 years I've
NEVER had my glasses fall apart or fall off except during rough sports)

Is it because passengers get nervous about the pilot wearing glasses ?


Ron Miller  ( 20/450 correctable to 20/15)

at: {ihnp4}!hpfcla!ron