Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site gloria.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!gloria!colonel From: colonel@gloria.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman) Newsgroups: net.books Subject: Re: Objectivism Message-ID: <779@gloria.UUCP> Date: Mon, 27-May-85 16:11:01 EDT Article-I.D.: gloria.779 Posted: Mon May 27 16:11:01 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 20:04:56 EDT References: <-178800@decwrl.UUCP> <4500005@hpfclp.UUCP> <612@tpvax.fluke.UUCP> Organization: SUNY-Buffalo Computer Sci. Lines: 26 ["A is for Atlas." --Rand McNally] > > Those who have acquiesced to the point that they are no longer > > believe that it is possible to know something with certainty have become > > the destroyers of science, and the haters of any other rational > > endeavor. It is my opinion that SUPERFORCE ignores the axiom of > > existence and proceeds to mutilate the concepts by which we interpret an > > objective reality. By mutilating these concepts, the author is > > mutilating man's mind. > > HEAR, HEAR! I am one of those unfortunately few who believe in an objective > reality. I particularly take exception to the notion that merely to observe > something results in changing it. The very simplest example can easily prove > this is a "truth": see that peri^od? How does it change when I turn my eyes > in it's direction, and then look away? I don't think it changed in anyway > whatsoever. It is still a area piece of phosphorescent material that was > excited by electons until it glowed. Only as you read this, it is doing it > on YOUR screen, not mine. It's still the same piece of data, though. Whether > it persists or not is another thing. Would you please move this one-sided "discussion" to net.philosophy, where it belongs? (Or does it indeed belong in net.books? Objectivists are the only "philosophers" I know of who model the world on A's and periods.) -- Col. G. L. Sicherman ...{rocksvax|decvax}!sunybcs!colonel