Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tymix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!tymix!kanner
From: kanner@tymix.UUCP (Herb Kanner)
Newsgroups: net.video,net.consumers
Subject: Re: Is cable TV worthwhile?
Message-ID: <420@tymix.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-May-85 14:29:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: tymix.420
Posted: Fri May 17 14:29:09 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 23-May-85 07:45:57 EDT
References: <529@terak.UUCP> <573@intelca.UUCP> <205@tove.UUCP>
Reply-To: kanner@tymix.UUCP (Herb Kanner)
Distribution: na
Organization: Tymnet Inc., Cupertino CA
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <205@tove.UUCP> dsn@tove.UUCP (Dana S. Nau) writes:
>> What do you think?  Is cable TV still worth what you're paying for it?
>> ...... 
>> -- 
>> Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{ihnp4,seismo,decvax}!noao!terak!doug
>
>Well, since I don't have it, I'm not paying anything for it, so I suppose
>it's worth what I'm paying!  (I'm one of those people who have never seen fit
>to buy a TV set.)
>-- 
>Dana S. Nau,  Computer Science Dept.,  U. of Maryland,  College Park, MD 20742
>ARPA:  dsn@maryland				CSNet:  dsn@umcp-cs
>UUCP:  {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!dsn	Phone:  (301) 454-7932
Now what in the world could have given you the idea that every na
subscriber to net.consumers is interested in the amazing fact that you have
never seen fit to by a TV set.


-- 
Herb Kanner
Tymnet, Inc.