Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!oyster
From: oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster)
Newsgroups: net.cooks
Subject: MSG - Enough already!
Message-ID: <1170@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-May-85 13:00:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.1170
Posted: Fri May 31 13:00:03 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 14:20:52 EDT
References: <357@ttidcb.UUCP> <449@mtunh.UUCP> <5700@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Reply-To: oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious oyster)
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 19

In article <5700@ucla-cs.ARPA> ellen@ucla-cs.UUCP (Ellen Perlman) writes:
>other hand, is quite sensitive, and gets terrible headaches, so can this
>"is a crock" crap.  In fact, the number of people sensitive to MSG is not 
>minute, 'tho' naturally degree of sensitivity varies.  
>
   So, some people react to MSG and some don't.  Do we have a consensus?

   Oh, and the "is a crock" line was made by somebody in reference to 
somebody elses' statement that "MSG ensures" reactions, cancer, etc. (In
fact, the line went "the argument AS STATED is a crock" [my caps]).  I
concurred when I read it, because I don't react adversely to MSG.  Perhaps
the initial statement should have been ammended to read "MSG ensures
reactions in a not minute number of people."  'Nuff said.


-- 
 - j "vo" p

{allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!oyster