Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!unc!fsks
From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <297@unc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 26-May-85 14:06:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.297
Posted: Sun May 26 14:06:48 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 00:09:10 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <372@h-sc1.UUCP> <385@mtxinu.UUCP> <ttidcc.442>
Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.flame:10146 net.women:5311
Summary: 

>>
>>                      ... I've never thought the female anatomy was
>>   exactly fair (if I ever run into God, I'll ask her what on earth
>>   she was thinking of...).
>>	marie desjardins

>This appears to be evidence of God's masculinity. (-:{
>The Polymath (aka: Jerry Hollombe)

I always assumed gender is an attribute relevent only for beings
which must reproduce.  God does not reproduce (at least according
to MY religious denomination).

:-) The only reason for visualizing God as male is that God is the boss
(Dominance is a masculine attribute).

	Frank Silbermann