Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!unc!fsks From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper. Message-ID: <292@unc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 26-May-85 13:08:52 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.292 Posted: Sun May 26 13:08:52 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 00:15:01 EDT References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill Lines: 21 Xref: watmath net.flame:10143 net.women:5307 Summary: Ed Hall: >> >The last time I heard this discussed it ended up with a counter- >> >accusation: how can men avoid wetting themselves, considering how >> >poorly they aim? If you've ever cleaned a bathroom you'll know >> >what I mean. Yeeeccchhh... Phil Ngai: >> I don't think it's always bad aim, as I am usually careful about my >> aim and my bathroom still needs a fair amount of cleaning. I think it >> may be due to a higher splash factor arising from a greater difference >> in level. In article sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) writes: >I think it is due to testosterone poisonning myself. The only reason >you disgusting people don't sit down when you're doing your business >is that you somehow think it is more manly to do it standing up. Nonsense. To sit down, we'd have to take our pants all the way down. And then pull them up again. That's too much work. Furthermore, it's more sanitary (for US) standing up.