Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site galbp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!galbp!bing From: bing@galbp.UUCP (Bing Bang) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women Subject: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper. Message-ID: <148@galbp.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-May-85 01:52:54 EDT Article-I.D.: galbp.148 Posted: Wed May 29 01:52:54 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 03:23:53 EDT References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <372@h-sc1.UUCP> <385@mtxinu.UUCP> <> Reply-To: bing@galbp.UUCP (Bing Bang) Organization: Lanier Business Products, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia Lines: 19 Xref: watmath net.flame:10157 net.women:5335 Summary: >>> >>> ... I've never thought the female anatomy was >>> exactly fair (if I ever run into God, I'll ask her what on earth >>> she was thinking of...). >>> marie desjardins from where i am i think the female anatomy is a work of art... much more pleasing than male anatomy. but i suppose bing male i do have my biases... and as for god being female, i think it has possibilities... just read the bible. she (god) can be a very vindictive bitch... lest some one takes me seriously, my tongue is deep in my cheek -- ---------- "Is anything really real?" ...akgua!galbp!bing