Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-edu1!hua
From: hua@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Ernest Hua)
Newsgroups: net.origins,net.flame,net.religion
Subject: Dan Bullshitvich (You too, Arndt)
Message-ID: <324@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 29-May-85 20:21:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-e.324
Posted: Wed May 29 20:21:15 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 31-May-85 05:14:44 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 28
Xref: linus net.origins:1637 net.flame:9343 net.religion:6587

___________________________________________________________________________

Dan, get this crap off net.origins.  Until you get the difference between
religion and science straight, stay out of net.origins.

>From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
>
>>>Evolution had no beginning? Sounds like Hinduism! What kind of science
>>>is this? Is this net.ORIGINS or net.naturalflow?
>>
>>I resent your implied criticism of Hinduism! If you want to flame about the
>>ignorant pagans who have not accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior,
>>please do so in net.religion.bigot!!!
>
>I resent your ability to read in to my statement exactly what you
>would like to hear and not what it actually says!
>
>I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism! I am criticizing the statement that
>Evolution has no beginning. If special beginning implies religion
>(Genesis), than no beginning equally implies religion (Hinduism).
>
>AGAIN, I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism, I am criticizing a so-called
>scientific theory for being amazingly similar to religion. Which
>is exactly what evolutionists do about creationism.
___________________________________________________________________________

"F.O.A.D."
Keebler { hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.arpa }