Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site avsdS.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!dsd!avsdS!steve
From: steve@avsdS.UUCP (Steve Russell)
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Alignment
Message-ID: <36@avsdS.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-May-85 19:26:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: avsdS.36
Posted: Thu May 30 19:26:44 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Jun-85 07:38:41 EDT
References: <1139@cbosgd.UUCP> <167@ucdavis.UUCP> <938@ttds.UUCP> <200@ucdavis.UUCP>
Organization: Ampex Audio-Video Engineering, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 17

> > Now, as DM, I don't play alignment strict, but instead inform the player
> > that he/she is stepping over the alignment limit. And then, if it happens
> > all too often, I deem it a change of alignment and inform the player so.

> So what's the point?  If they change behavior, you just change the
> alignment.  Might as well skip the whole idea in the first place.
> 					--rick heli

This raises a point. Do you penalize the player with a loss of level
if it turns out that your interpetation of his alignment is different
than his?

Would you support a proposal to allow the player to be 're-aligned'
without penality if his/her play doesn't match your interpetation?

steve
AMPEX