Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!guy
From: guy@sun.uucp (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C names
Message-ID: <2229@sun.uucp>
Date: Sun, 26-May-85 18:00:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.2229
Posted: Sun May 26 18:00:53 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 00:24:18 EDT
References: <4316@mit-eddie.UUCP> <1917@cornell.UUCP> <703@burl.UUCP>
Distribution: net.lang.c
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 12

> I just came back from C-day at Murray Hill yesterday, and many
> of my fears about the new ANSI standardization have been allayed;
> they've stuck very closely to K&R in most respects.  More I cannot
> say because of proprietary rules (I don't know how much of the day
> was proprietary but I'll feel better assuming it was all such).

Proprietary rules?  AT&T is more paranoid that I thought.  The ANSI C
standard is 100% non-proprietary; AT&T's plans for ANSI C compatibility may
be proprietary, but the degree to which ANSI C is or isn't like K&R is
public information.

	Guy Harris