Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peregrine.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!pertec!peregrine!mike
From: mike@peregrine.UUCP (Mike Wexler)
Newsgroups: net.lang,net.lang.c,net.micro,net.micro.pc
Subject: 808?, 80?8? >64k performance
Message-ID: <114@peregrine.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Jun-85 15:08:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: peregrin.114
Posted: Sat Jun  1 15:08:26 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 21:18:44 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Peregrine, Systems, Irvine, Ca
Lines: 14
Xref: utcs net.lang:1574 net.lang.c:5245 net.micro:10292 net.micro.pc:4074

I am currently writing an article on problems with Intel's chips
when running programs written in high level languages(read c).
I would appreciate any benchmarks(source and timings) comparing
small and large model, comparing other processors, and showing
the actually assembly language generated in the compilation process.
I am mainly focusing on the C language both other examples will
also be appreciated.  

I would also appreciate any feedback on how to get around these 
performance problems when porting a large c coded application to
a pc environment.  My objective is to use the same source code
with a few #defines and #ifdefs to speed up the program. Also
global changes that can be used on many systems(micro/mini/mainframe)
are appreciated.