Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!AlHall.osbunorth@XEROX.ARPA
From: AlHall.osbunorth@XEROX.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Header-People and X.400
Message-ID: <11162@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 30-May-85 16:01:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.11162
Posted: Thu May 30 16:01:17 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 12:24:07 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 12


Do any of you depend upon the ordering of ARPA headers ?  The answer to
this question would help me decide how much of the "extra" information
of the ARPA header needs to be preserved when the header is parsed into
X.400 Attributes.

For example, I assume that a set of Received: fields should be kept in
order, but does it make a difference to anyone if the entire block was
moved to, say, the end of the ARPA header ?

		Thanks,
		  Al