Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mcc-db.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!mcc-db!ables
From: ables@mcc-db.UUCP (King Ables)
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: Re: Another Prime Number Question With No Practical Application
Message-ID: <199@mcc-db.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-May-85 10:53:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: mcc-db.199
Posted: Mon May 20 10:53:32 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 31-May-85 03:21:23 EDT
References: <226@ihnet.UUCP> <574@lll-crg.ARPA> <298@faron.UUCP> <3725@alice.UUCP> <591@lll-crg.ARPA>
Organization: MCC (Austin, TX)
Lines: 10

> ..in many of the postings on this, I have seen "9" or numbers ending in "9"
> given as answers.  Last I heard, 9 was divisible by 1, 3, and 9.

Well, if 9 is in the list (I haven't been paying too much attention) then
they're either joking or confused... but some numbers ending in "9" are ok
(for example, 19 and 29).

-King
ARPA: ables@mcc
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!mcc-db!ables