Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!amd!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle) Newsgroups: net.arch,net.lang.c,net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.68k Subject: Re: Re: Re: Need 286 "C" benchmark Message-ID: <635@cadovax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 28-May-85 15:31:30 EDT Article-I.D.: cadovax.635 Posted: Tue May 28 15:31:30 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 11:30:53 EDT References: <426@oakhill.UUCP> <8745@microsoft.UUCP> <583@intelca.UUCP> <433@oakhill.UUCP>, <588@intelca.UUCP> Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA Lines: 35 Xref: linus net.arch:1100 net.lang.c:4813 net.micro:9329 net.micro.pc:3806 net.micro.68k:784 >> int a[50000]; >> >> main() >> { >> int i; >> for (i=0; i<50000; i++) a[i+1] = a[i]; >> } >> >> Dave Trissel {seismo,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet >> Motorola Semiconductor Inc. Austin, Texas > >Hmmm, once again Dave has submitted a benchmark that requires more than 64K >of data. This continued harping on the issue seems to indicate to me that >maybe Dave realizes that for programs that require less than 64K of data >that a 12MHz 286 actually keeps pace with the 16.67 MHz 68020. Of course, >he might not be saying this at all, and far be it for ME to try to read >between his lines of code.....I would like to see the 680{00,10,20} >performance numbers and system configurations for these benchmarks, though, >just for internal curiousity. >-- >Ken Shoemaker, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca. > Well, Dave's approach is certainly no worse than the Intel ad which is presented without several important OHBYTHEWAY's. Intel's assumtion that all programs and data are <64k is no better than Motorola's assumtion that they're all >64k. Realizing that this is a basic difference in performance between the two processors, I'd like to see benchmarks that address programs and data of sizes both <64k and >64k. (of course then we can write benchmarks that use 12 registers to make the Motorola look good, and ones that use 2 to make the Intel look good.) Keith Doyle # {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd