Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!mrl
From: mrl@drutx.UUCP (LongoMR)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.politics
Subject: Re: State Tax Dedudction
Message-ID: <2916@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-May-85 15:26:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.2916
Posted: Fri May 31 15:26:51 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 03:15:31 EDT
References: <735@mtuxo.UUCP> <896@mhuxt.UUCP> <1042@ihuxb.UUCP> <899@mhuxt.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.misc:8032 net.politics:9174

It seems to me that this would be fair IF all states received
the same amount of federal aid. I don't know whether that is the
case, but one would think that the more a state could do for
itself, the less federal money it would require for "state-supported"
programs. Therefore, states without income tax would, in effect, be
getting MORE from the federal government.

Please, no flames -- intelligent answers to the net -- I am
not an expert on these matters, I only throw this out for comment...

Mark Longo
AT&T Denver