Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!cepu!ucla-cs!srt
From: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: L-O-L-A Lola
Message-ID: <5768@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 31-May-85 16:06:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5768
Posted: Fri May 31 16:06:01 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 3-Jun-85 00:14:11 EDT
References: <1634@cornell.UUCP> <413@wdl1.UUCP> <674@udenva.UUCP> <2208@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP (Scott Turner)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 23

In article <2208@sun.uucp> sunny@sun.uucp (Ms. Sunny Kirsten) writes:
>> > > From: nax (Nax-Paul)
>> > are  you *sure* Lola was not a woman? The song ends:
>> > > 
>> > > 	"I'm glad I'm a man and so is Lola."
>> > > 
>> > > So they're *both* glad the singer is a man -- but what's Lola's gender?
>
>Her gender is "feminine" ...

All right.  Enough of this bullshit:

Ray Davies has been interviewed on this point HUNDREDS of times.
The song is purposely ambigious, and was intentionally written
that way.

Now, can we get on with net.movies style discussions and restrain this sort
of thing to net.inane?

    Scott R. Turner
    ARPA:  (now) srt@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA  (soon) srt@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU
    UUCP:  ...!{cepu,ihnp4,trwspp,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!srt
    SPUDNET: ...eye%srt@russet.spud