Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!dan
From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: slander
Message-ID: <320@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-May-85 17:30:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.320
Posted: Fri May 24 17:30:54 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 25-May-85 23:17:06 EDT
References: <-41400@psivax.UUCP> <14600014@hpfcrs.UUCP> <634@cadovax.UUCP>
Reply-To: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 21
Summary: 



>> Evolution had no beginning? Sounds like Hinduism! What kind of science
>> is this? Is this net.ORIGINS or net.naturalflow?

>Here I will flame:
>I resent your implied criticism of Hinduism! If you want to flame about the
>ignorant pagans who have not accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior,
>please do so in net.religion.bigot!!!


  I resent your ability to read in to my statement exactly what you
  would like to hear and not what it actually says!

  I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism! I am criticizing the statement that
  Evolution has no beginning. If special beginning implies religion
  (Genesis), than no beginning equally implies religion (Hinduism).

  AGAIN, I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism, I am criticizing a so-called
  scientific theory for being amazingly similar to religion. Which
  is exactly what evolutionists do about creationism.