Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!aecom!schwadro
From: schwadro@aecom.UUCP (David Schwadron)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Interest.
Message-ID: <1684@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-May-85 11:22:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: aecom.1684
Posted: Fri May 24 11:22:59 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 25-May-85 09:27:00 EDT
References: <2292@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 15

>        An explanation of the possibility of continuous QM
>                                         John Williams

	Isn't this a conflict in terms? "continuous Quantum" is
oxymoronic. Quanta are discrete units. You can not have discrete units
continuous. Apparently not.
	The idea that quantum uncertainty is perceived, and not
"real" is accepted among many scientists. But that does not mean
that the quantum aspects can be reconciled.
              michab

...aecom!berger
-- 
Robert Berlinger
...{philabs,cucard,pegasus,ihnp4,rocky2}!aecom!naftoli