Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646 From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Red plot foiled at govt. agency (OSHA) Message-ID: <1340116@acf4.UUCP> Date: Sun, 26-May-85 22:06:00 EDT Article-I.D.: acf4.1340116 Posted: Sun May 26 22:06:00 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 30-May-85 03:32:42 EDT References: <466@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 39 >/* carnes@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Richard Carnes) / 5:08 pm May 24, 1985 */ >. . . How come we never think of these things. Pay closer attention, Richard, and maybe you'll learn something. :-) >Heaven forbid we should impose an injustice on business, but what >about the problems of worker safety and health that OSHA was intended >to address? Millions of workers are daily exposed to such toxic >substances as lead, cyanide, silica dust, cotton dust, pesticides, >asbestos, and radioactive materials, and many workers are required to >risk their physical safety in various ways. I believe that most libertarians are atheistic, so the heavenly reference is probably inappropriate. Required by whom? If I say that you are required to do A, are you going to do it just because I said so? However, if I require you to do A in order to obtain B from me, you have two choices: you can do A, or forget about the deal. But it's YOUR choice. >. . . and they are >outraged by government-imposed safety standards for both airlines and >nuclear power plants. Does this antiregulatory stance extend to the >prohibition of all workplace safety and health regulation as well? Yes. >Let us have [trumpets, please] the Libertarian Solution to the >problems of occupational risk. And make sure it's a simple one. Thanks just the same for the trumpets, but we prefer substance to sensationalism. >Richard Carnes, ihnp4!gargoyle!carnes Mike Sykora