Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Discrimination and Affirmative Action
Message-ID: <1340129@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Jun-85 03:45:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1340129
Posted: Sat Jun  1 03:45:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Jun-85 07:07:49 EDT
References: <266@unc.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 12

>/* 9234dwz@houxf.UUCP (T.SIEFRING) /  9:46 am  May 30, 1985 */

>I use qualified above to include education, experience, competency,
>which are the general parameters used in evaluating someone for a
>promotion. Anyone think these should be changed ????????

Yes.  Whether someone is "qualified" should be determined by
whoever is contracting with the employee for his (her) services.
Thus, the meaning of "qualified" is subjective and is not
necessarily what you described above.

					Mike Sykora