Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!josh From: josh@topaz.ARPA (J Storrs Hall) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Libertarians in Space Message-ID: <2178@topaz.ARPA> Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 03:23:41 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.2178 Posted: Mon Jun 3 03:23:41 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Jun-85 00:37:19 EDT References: <446@qantel.UUCP> Reply-To: josh@topaz.UUCP (J Storrs Hall) Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 31 In article <446@qantel.UUCP> gabor@qantel.UUCP (Gabor Fencsik@ex2642) writes: >JoSH , in his Arpanet digest (V5 #23), discusses >space colonization as follows: >>... However, I'll be damned if I'll give it >>to a political entity (read: any organization in which voting occurs). > >Why is it that political transactions are a BAD THING whereas market >transactions are GOOD THINGS? It's a shame you didn't quote (read?) the rest of the article. I believe that markets work better than majoritarian rule in general; and in the article in question I gave several specific reasons germane to the particular endeavor in question, including the fact that there is a considerable danger of "absolute power corrupting" when an organization runs a machine (space colony) on which everyone's life depends. > I can only speculate but my guess is that >political transactions seem inherently impure, involving parliamentary >nonsense, emotionalism, compromises and distasteful tradeoffs between >logically unrelated demands of interest groups. Market transactions, on >the other hand, are purely technical and are apparently amenable to >cold analysis. ... >Gabor Fencsik {dual,nsc,hplabs,intelca,proper}!qantel!gabor Each is amenable to the same analysis, but people refuse to analyze the political process in the same light they do the market. I suggest that you merely start with the same assumption: that individuals operating in a political system will all try to maximize their self-interest. Try it--I expect you'll be a libertarian by tomorrow. --JoSH