Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.puzzle
Subject: Re: How to win a bottle of Champagne
Message-ID: <901@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 10:22:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.901
Posted: Mon Jun  3 10:22:25 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Jun-85 06:13:24 EDT
References: <179@ubvax.UUCP> <262@zaphod.UUCP> <1467@utah-gr.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 22

> I sure am glad I took a minute to work this problem before reading the
> next article (the one this message is a followup to).  Otherwise I
> wouldn't have had the pleasure of discovering the answer for myself.
> *PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE*, if you must show off your puzzle-solving ability
> by posting the answer to the net, at least encrypt the solution (and add
> a "(SPOILER)" to the header, for extra warning.)  

    Could I get some feedback from others on this subject?  I always
assume that if the title of an article says 'Re: How to confuse Penguins'
that the article very well might be the *answer* to the 'How to confuse
Penguins' puzzle.  I've seen very few people posting spoiler warnings or
rotating answers to puzzles, and personally have never missed them.  But
then again, I usually *do* take a minute to work out the interesting
puzzles I find here immediately, and usually don't need such warnings 
anyhow.
    Are there more people out there who think solutions to puzzles should
have warnings and be rotated?  Howabout just a warning?
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
    "Sundown, yellow moon.  I replay the past.
     I know every scene by heart; they all went by so fast." - Dylan