Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-mrvax!ddb From: ddb@mrvax.DEC Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Yashicamat 124G Message-ID: <2372@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-May-85 10:01:25 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.2372 Posted: Thu May 30 10:01:25 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 01:00:39 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 36 I had one of these, lo these many years ago. I was very happy with mine; it let me get into 6x6 format on a budget, and the lens was good enough for portraits and landscapes blown up to at least 11x14. Don't recall if I tried going larger. I also worked with a wedding/portrait photographer who used a pair of them for some time, with considerable success (in fact I bought one of his old ones when he invested in 6x6 SLRs). The Yashicamat is a twin-lens reflex, which means it has separate viewing and taking lenses on the front. Light entering the viewing lens bounces off a simple mirrow and onto the top-mounted viewing screen; this leads to left-right reversed images, but at least they are right side up. The pop-up magnifier is good for critical focusing on the ground glass. The "sportsfinder" mentioned isn't good for anything these days; back when 35mm wasn't a usable format, the sportsfinder was an attempt at making it possible to photograph action with one of these. It sort of worked, but a rangefinder or SLR system is much better for action. The coupled meter in the Yashicamat works, but I almost always used a separate meter (I was in the habit of carrying them because my main camera at the time was a Leica M3, with no meter). Since I used the camera only for relatively static situations, this was no problem, and indeed I probably would have used a separate meter to make selective readings around the scene even if I'd been using a 35mm SLR with meter. Since the cheapest medium-format SLR (the Mamiya 645J last time I looked) costs about $500, a $125 yashicamat (or cheaper; shop around) is a reasonable way to deal with at least many of the situations for which a medium-format negative is deisrable. (Oh, for those who haven't read between the lines yet, the BIG drawback of the Yashicamat is that the lenses aren't interchangeable; you can get "auxiliary" wide-angle and closeup lenses, but I never did and I'm VERY suspicious of them.) -- David Dyer-Bennet -- ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-mrvax!ddb