Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!gymble!lll-crg!dual!unisoft!mtxinu!rtech!bobm From: bobm@rtech.UUCP (Bob Mcqueer) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Cover Artwork in general (really back-cover blurbs) Message-ID: <420@rtech.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-May-85 16:47:03 EDT Article-I.D.: rtech.420 Posted: Tue May 21 16:47:03 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 24-May-85 20:46:20 EDT References: <2002@topaz.ARPA> Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA Lines: 31 > > And finally, a departing flame: Cover art can be said to be worthwhile > even if it doesn't concern the book, but can the same be said for back- > cover blurbs that badly distort the plot/theme/tone of a novel? > ... OR give away the ending, if they even come close to saying anything realistic about the novel. I can agree with this particular gripe completely. Of the SF books I've read recently, I'd estimate about 50-70% of the cover art to fit a reasonable visualization of the book (not always in agreement with MINE, but reasonable). However, the blurbs always seem to be missing the major point, turning every novel into a scenario for a bad movie, revealing what's going to happen, or some mixture of all of the above together with various and sundry other critical sins. Even literate, intelligent work has to be adorned by the publisher with the sort of hype that together with TV and movie promotional drivel provides employement for the modern day equivalent of a carnival barker. If a worthwile comment somehow DOES find its way to the back cover, it is usually seriously out of context. What's REALLY annoying is that I seem to be unable NOT to read the back of a book while I'm considering buying it. I would like to be able to use the back cover notes to determine if a paperback might appeal to me before plunking down my $3.95 + tax, rather than having to rely solely on familiarity with the author or on criticism gathered elsewhere. Next flame: those silly, oversized, overpriced "TRADE" paper editions! Back to scanning this group for pointers to interesting novels, since I can't tell by the cover [art | blurbs]. Bob McQueer ihnp4!amdahl!rtech!bobm