Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!shawn
From: shawn@mit-eddie.UUCP (Shawn McKay)
Newsgroups: net.sources,net.lang.c
Subject: C names
Message-ID: <4316@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-May-85 15:43:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.4316
Posted: Tue May 21 15:43:52 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 23-May-85 01:17:21 EDT
Distribution: net.sources,net.lang.c
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.sources:2926 net.lang.c:5264


If you wish to make such large changes, why don't you change the name
of the language? What berkeley folks use IS NOT C as is documented
by the K&R book. Which I would expect to be the ONLY reasonable standard
to be used to define the 'C programming language'. Perhaps it's time
for the 'D' programming language. I'll leave out what I think D should
stand for.

			Yours In Hacking,
			  -- Shawn
p.s.:
Flamers reply at own risk.

Uucp: mit-eddie!shawn
Arpa: Shawn at Mit-Mc