Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.space Subject: ultralight probes Message-ID: <5630@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Sat, 25-May-85 21:06:15 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.5630 Posted: Sat May 25 21:06:15 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 25-May-85 21:06:15 EDT Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 76 In response to Jim Houser's query for ideas about a near-term interstellar probe (which I've unfortunately had to shoot down in a separate article)... Here is another interesting notion which is a bit closer to reality, and which could use some ideas. The highest-performing solar sails that we know how to build are Eric Drexler's aluminum sails. His "baseline" design is 10 km across and has high performance with a 20-ton payload. Building a 10-km object in space (Drexler sails are rigid and cannot be folded for launch) is a bit on the ambitious side just yet, especially since air-drag problems may rule out construction in the very low orbits that give maximum shuttle payload. Consider a scaled-down version: 100 m across, hauling a payload of 2 kg. Obviously this cannot be manned, but it could still be very useful for comet rendezvous missions, surveying the asteriod belt for resources, etc. The big question is, can we build a complete control and communications system, with useful instruments, within 2 kg?? Some weight growth is acceptable, although it can't be an order of magnitude or performance will suffer. (The 100-m sail weighs only 2 kg itself, so a 20-kg load would be a huge increase in total vehicle mass.) Long life and near-total absence of moving parts are major virtues, since this thing will spend a long time in space. (Some of this might even be relevant to Houser's proposal...) Power and communications will obviously be major issues. Solar cells are the obvious choice for power, but very lightweight construction will be vital. Can we get away with a rigidly-mounted solar array, bearing in mind that the sail constrains the sun angle substantially? Communications will probably require a steerable antenna, alas. Would optical communication be better? Basic control will probably be by tiny winches on the sail shrouds, which will have the net effect of shifting the payload's position with respect to the sail. Is this sufficient? Note that the sail spins slowly to maintain its rigidity; can clever design of communications, guidance sensors, and instrumentation avoid the need for a despun platform? If not, perhaps the spinning and despun sections should have independent solar arrays and computer systems, communicating optically, to avoid the reliability problems of carrying power through rotating bearings. Substantial onboard computing is needed, since this vehicle is "under power" at all times, albeit at very low acceleration. Speed-of-light lags impose the usual limitations on human intervention. Close approaches to asteroids would be particular tricky. Can we get radiation-resistant chips with enough computing power and sufficiently-low current drain? What sort of instrumentation would be practical? Imaging is obviously a high priority. We could use the sail spin for one dimension of scan, although this will mean slow imaging because the sail spin isn't quick. Limited communications power may impose serious constraints on imaging data rates anyway. How much steerability do we need for useful imaging? Filter wheels are troublesome; can we get away with multiple image sensors with fixed filters? If we do use an ordinary 2-dimensional imaging sensor, what about a pattern of filter stripes across the image? Obviously navigation wants a sun sensor; can the imaging system be used for this? If not, can it at least be used for the rest of the guidance requirements? Note that real-time attitude control requires on-board interpretation of sensor data. Can we measure micrometeoroid density by measuring perforations of the sail? The resulting "collecting area" is orders of magnitude larger than anything we can do with a separate sensor, but scanning it for small perforations isn't trivial. If we use optical communications via solid-state laser, could the communications system's laser and receiver be used to scan the sail? Solid-state radiation sensors are an obvious possibility. How detailed can we make their data return within severe weight constraints? Can we get enough sensitivity for things like gamma-ray spectrometry, to examine asteroids and comets for volatiles? Ideas welcome... -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry