Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!rick From: rick@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey Subject: Re: NHL Expansion, if any Message-ID: <5566@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Mon, 20-May-85 17:13:24 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5566 Posted: Mon May 20 17:13:24 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 23-May-85 03:30:06 EDT References: <1820@watcgl.UUCP> Reply-To: rick@ucla-cs.UUCP (Richard Gillespie) Distribution: net Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 31 Keywords: Oh no, not again! Summary: In article <1820@watcgl.UUCP> sahayman@watcgl.UUCP (Steve Hayman) writes: > ... >What do the net readers think are some viable locations for NHL teams, >either expansion or transfer? > ... >Maybe even 2 in Toronto, who knows. Obviously this is unlikely to happen in >the immediate future, though. There's no justice. How do you count 2 in Toronto? Surely, you aren't including the Leafs in your reckoning! :-) Anyway, it would be incredibly *stupid* of the NHL to expand at this point. They are just barely recovering from past fiascos, and don't need the burden of 2 (or more) new bozo teams that will not win for several years. The hockey talent is still pretty diluted in the league, but is much better than a couple of years ago. Maybe in about 5 years the league can consider expansion - but it would require lots of good planning. The only point I can see to expansion is to get a sensible number of teams in the league - add 3 to make 24 (whoever heard of a 21 team professional league?). --- Rick Gillespie ARPANET: rick@ucla-locus.ARPA or (soon) rick@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU UUCP: ...!{cepu|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|ucbvax}!ucla-cs!rick SPUDNET: ...eye%rick@russet.spud or ...opark.6%rick@russet.spud (if opark.6 is ever up again) -- Rick Gillespie ARPANET: rick@ucla-locus.ARPA or (soon) rick@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU UUCP: ...!{cepu|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|ucbvax}!ucla-cs!rick SPUDNET: ...eye%rick@russet.spud or ...opark.6%rick@russet.spud (if opark.6 is ever up again)