Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxa!ajf
From: ajf@pyuxa.UUCP (A Figura)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Male curfews (insurance actually)
Message-ID: <1238@pyuxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-May-85 13:10:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxa.1238
Posted: Mon May 20 13:10:26 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 24-May-85 20:13:07 EDT
References: <360@boulder.UUCP>, <593@mnetor.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 5

I'm amazed at the insurance companies logic in general, but I too have often
wondered about reduced coverage for women because they live longer. Why not
give women increased benefits, since they live longer and thus pay more
in premiums over their lifetimes then men. Or am I missing something?