Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amd!nsc!srm
From: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: ``they'' vs *US*
Message-ID: <2767@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-May-85 13:53:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.2767
Posted: Mon May 27 13:53:27 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 29-May-85 03:25:00 EDT
References: <186@timeinc.UUCP> <442@sftri.UUCP> <198@timeinc.UUCP>
Reply-To: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 13

In article <198@timeinc.UUCP> greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) writes:
>
>And a woman still, I feel, reduces her chance of 
>being raped if she is concious that her actions might trigger 
>the sickie out there.  It still isn't *her* fault.

In all the responses to Ross's article about "provocative clothing", no one
seems to have challenged its basic premise.  Do you have any evidence at all,
Ross, that the kind of clothing a woman wears has any effect whatsoever on
her chance of being raped?
-- 
Richard Mateosian
{cbosgd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm    nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA