Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amd!nsc!srm
From: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: ``they'' vs *US*
Message-ID: <2769@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-May-85 16:01:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.2769
Posted: Mon May 27 16:01:55 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 29-May-85 03:25:43 EDT
References: <186@timeinc.UUCP> <442@sftri.UUCP> <1395@watdcsu.UUCP>
Reply-To: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 16

In article <1395@watdcsu.UUCP> dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) writes:
>
>But what if the choice of clothing *does* influence the likelihood of
>rape?  A woman who truly believes that this is not so will see no need
>to be careful about how she dresses, and she'll innocently increase her
>chances of getting raped.
>
>It is important to have good evidence for such a statement, because
>the consequences of being wrong are serious.

This is like saying that you should invest substantial portions of your
life's energy in the observance of certain religious forms, because you
might just go to Hell if you don't.
-- 
Richard Mateosian
{cbosgd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm    nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA