Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!nsc!srm
From: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Lobotomies
Message-ID: <2771@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-May-85 03:42:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.2771
Posted: Tue May 28 03:42:55 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 29-May-85 03:26:03 EDT
References: <1630@aecom.UUCP> <1648@aecom.UUCP> <568@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Reply-To: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 17
Summary: 

>
>Looks like you two have already had the lobotomies.  How else you could
>have read this far in the postings and still have utterly missed the
>entire point of the suggestion?  My first reaction to the lobotomy
>suggestion was "Great Idea!  Here's a perfect first subject!".  But now
>that I see how ineffective it is, I guess we better come up with something
>else.  Maybe we could put 'em all on a farm shortly after birth (and make
>sure they don't have access to terminals).
>
Do they joke about gas ovens in net.religion.jewish?  Doesn't it rub you
the wrong way to have people--even in jest--suggesting application to
anyone of one of the most brutal techniques ever devised for the repression
of women?  Has everyone forgotten the fifties?

-- 
Richard Mateosian
{cbosgd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm    nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA