Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!beth
From: beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Beth Christy)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Discrimination against white men - Definition Please
Message-ID: <600@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-May-85 21:46:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: sphinx.600
Posted: Wed May 29 21:46:54 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Jun-85 12:42:34 EDT
References: <182@kontron.UUCP>
Organization: U. Chicago - Computation Center
Lines: 17

From: cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer), Message-ID: <182@kontron.UUCP>:
>All of L S Chabot's remarks about how Carl Deitrick benefitted apply to
>*everyone* in America today --- food and products are cheap for everyone,
>not just white males.  The benefits of the railroads accrue to us today
>regardless of race and sex.  Why then, are white males subject to special
>discrimination?

Well, we've been talking about this issue in pretty vague terms for quite
some time now, and I have a feeling we're missing each other.  Would someone
out there who actually feels men are "subject to special discrimination"
please specify *exactly* what forms that "special discrimination" takes so
we can talk about it?  Please?  Thanx.

-- 

--JB                                          Life is just a bowl.