Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site wateng.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!wateng!ksbszabo From: ksbszabo@wateng.UUCP (Kevin Szabo) Newsgroups: net.works Subject: Re: Big & little machines & problems Message-ID: <2466@wateng.UUCP> Date: Sun, 2-Jun-85 04:00:10 EDT Article-I.D.: wateng.2466 Posted: Sun Jun 2 04:00:10 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Jun-85 05:44:58 EDT References: <2079@topaz.ARPA> <582@terak.UUCP> Reply-To: ksbszabo@wateng.UUCP (Kevin Szabo) Organization: VLSI Group, U of Waterloo Lines: 35 Summary: >> - you can write it all in assembler and be an "iron man" like >> Doug (and me in past lives), and God help you if the person involved >> ever leaves, gets run over by a truck, loses interest, etc. >But I had to pick my jaw up off the floor when I read the suggestion >that employers shouldn't hire talented people because if those people >left then the company would be in trouble! The original posting never mentioned anything about not hiring talented people to do a job. Quite the opposite actually. It was more a comment that you shouldn't hire people with TUNNEL vision. It is very interesting that you are still arguing the advantages of assemblers over High Level Languages while people are finding compilers preferable in designing HARDWARE. Yes, I'm talking about Silicon Compilation and its next of kin, Symbolic Layout. Both INITIALLY have a penalty in speed and chip size, however silicon is at the point where the emphasis has moved from squeezing a cpu onto a chip to a new outlook of trying to get the chip designed before the I.C. process is obsolete. Sorta sounds like operating systems development ten years ago doesn't it? As designers start using high level design tools they find that their designs can even turn out smaller than manually designed circuits. This occurs because design is fast enough that a few approaches can be experimented with, and initial design decisions are not as expensive to reverse when necessary. Machines like the MicroVax* and the ethernet chips would have never made it to market as quickly as they did without the benefit of High Level Design. And you're still harping on assembler. Sheesh. I hope everybody appreciates my not repeating all the talk about mom, apple pie, and greats like Amdahl & Cray. How all that fit in with the original statement I'll never know. Kevin -- Kevin Szabo watmath!wateng!ksbszabo (U of Waterloo VLSI Group, Waterloo Ont.)