Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!utcs!clarke From: clarke@utcs.UUCP Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: Re: Better DEAD than RED Message-ID: <703@utcs.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 12:28:02 EDT Article-I.D.: utcs.703 Posted: Thu Jun 20 12:28:02 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 20-Jun-85 12:43:55 EDT References: <893@mnetor.UUCP> <5642@utzoo.UUCP> <896@mnetor.UUCP> <5710@utzoo.UUCP> Reply-To: clarke@utcs.UUCP (Jim Clarke) Organization: University of Toronto - General Purpose UNIX Lines: 34 Summary: In article <5710@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes: >> Remember what the British did to the Indian cotton industry in the early >> 1800's? Remember how important the British cotton industry was to British >> industrialization, once it had finished off the Indians? > >British industrialization was already well underway by the early 1800's, >as I recall. But far from firmly established. And I don't think there were a lot of other industries so suitable for mechanization as the cloth industry. At any rate, it *was* the cotton industry that took off -- and it would have been delayed, at least for a couple of decades, if it had been in fair commercial competition with the Indian industry. > And the West was clearly the dominant culture on the planet >well before that. Non-dominant cultures are not in a position to forcibly >suppress competing industries on the other side of the world! I certainly >agree that the West took advantage of its position once it *had* it. But >the notion that the West climbed out of the mud in the first place by >pushing others back down into it is silly. >-- > Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology > {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry Well, apart from that phrase "in the first place", which is a bit of a weasel -- we all start at home, after all -- the notion doesn't seem at all silly to me, but perfectly natural. Everyone else did it that way. The only difference I can see between us and the Mongol hordes is that we last longer, and our means of oppression are a lot more sophisticated. Of course it's not always "oppression"; I'm glad I grew up in this culture, and most people who have tried two have a hard time rejecting ours. But there's a bad side too, and you can't just dismiss complaints of exploitation as "silly".