Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!utcs!mnetor!fred
From: fred@mnetor.UUCP
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: egg/chicken chicken/egg chigg/eckin
Message-ID: <1074@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Jun-85 09:31:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1074
Posted: Mon Jun 24 09:31:55 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Jun-85 10:19:05 EDT
References: <5710@utzoo.UUCP> <704@utcs.UUCP> <295@looking.UUCP> <15207@watmath.UUCP> <looking.296> <1592@dciem.UUCP>
Reply-To: fred@mnetor.UUCP (Fred Williams)
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 24
Summary: 

In article <1592@dciem.UUCP> mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) writes:
>[About "exploit":  I like to exploit my various abilities, and I hope
>my employers do, too.  I don't feel downtrodden because of it.  All of
>us try (or should try) to exploit our environment to our best advantage,
>but to do so isn't necessarily to the disadvantage ot the people and things
>with whom/which we interact.  We aren't in a zero-sum game.]
>-- 
>
>Martin Taylor
>{allegra,linus,ihnp4,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt
>{uw-beaver,qucis,watmath}!utcsri!dciem!mmt

	This all depends on what you mean by exploit. If you take from
your environment and return nothing but polution, you eventually
loose your environment. It's the philosophy that if other things
cannot live with you, then you will not live long either. We have
to learn to cooperate with nature to be successful from an
ecological standpoint ; and since I know this was not originally
a conservationist discussion, We have to learn to cooperate with the
natural laws in economics,(ie. supply & demand, etc.).
	Rather than exploitation, I think I prefer synergism!

Cheers,		Fred Williams