Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!tcp-ip
From: tcp-ip@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip
Subject: Re:  Retransmission policies
Message-ID: <8264@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 18-Jun-85 06:42:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8264
Posted: Tue Jun 18 06:42:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Jun-85 04:05:18 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 14

From: MILLS@USC-ISID.ARPA

In response to your message sent      Mon, 17 Jun 85 9:27:20 BST

Robert,

Yes, you do have a point. It's interesting that the issue of how big to
make a glob of data impacts performance so critically in both the
initial packetization (viz my earlier comments) and repacketization
policies. It would be instructive to test your TP-4 implementation with
respect to these policies, in view of the constraints of the protocol.

Dave
-------