Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!ucbvax!tcp-ip
From: tcp-ip@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: ARPANET/MILNET performance statistics
Message-ID: <7762@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 4-Jun-85 01:12:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7762
Posted: Tue Jun  4 01:12:35 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 01:42:22 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 22

From: MILLS@USC-ISID.ARPA

In response to your message sent  Mon, 3 Jun 85 16:13:14 EDT

Marianne,

I surely didn't mean to start a bluster here. Vint's original comment
addressed the curiousity that MILISI datagrams were fatter than the others.
Your data show this to be true in four of the five samples. My comment that
MILISI exibited more breakage than the others was not intended as a blanket
indictment and, in fact is not justified in view of your data. My suspicion
that ISI is indeed special is confirmed both because of the consistently high
datagram size, as well as the increasing share of the system load, going from
number four at the beginning of your sample history consistently upwards to
number one at the end. MILISI is again number one this week in both departments.

My aside to Vint that I would "alert the field operatives" has come to pass and
you have broken cover. Your next assignment, should you choose to accept it, is
to tell us why.

Dave
-------