Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!grkermi!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Disposition of Aborted Fetuses
Message-ID: <1808@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Jun-85 00:12:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1808
Posted: Mon Jun 10 00:12:38 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Jun-85 07:55:50 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 28

[]

From: garys@bunker.UUCP (Gary M. Samuelson) in <863@bunker.UUCP>:
>
>[...]
>  But more than that, if there is money to be
>made with aborted fetuses, this presents a colossal conflict
>of interest to physicians.  It is already more lucrative for
>a doctor to perform abortions than to take care of mother
>and child through a complete pregnancy.

False.  Abortions cost around $250.  Hospital birth *alone* is
reported to cost at least $1000, to say nothing of pre-natal
visits, post-partum checkups, etc.  Your conflict of interest
is a straw man.


Experimentation on live aborted fetuses is wrong and should be
stopped.  But that does not imply that abortion should be stopped
also.

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]