Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-lymph!arndt
From: arndt@lymph.DEC
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: He said *what*?????
Message-ID: <2694@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 17:06:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2694
Posted: Fri Jun 14 17:06:17 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Jun-85 10:25:17 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 34


Er, do I trust my eyes?  I believe I saw Ken Montgomery say, "Experimentation
on live aborted fetuses is wrong and should be stopped.  But that does not
imply that abortion should be stopped also."

TRYING TO THRUST YOUR MORALS DOWN OUR THROATS, KEN????

Why should such experiments be stopped?  "Wrong"??  Whatever does that
word mean?  If you mean YOU think it's wrong, I don't care.  If you mean
it's wrong for EVERYONE, why then WHY????  On what basis?  What do you say
to the doctor who wants to experiment?  

And what pray tell happens to the fetus when aborted 'alive' that makes it
worthy of your comments.  

Should the good doctors not notice anything of medical interest while performingan abortion so that they don't 'experiment'??

What to DO with the little bugger!  Damn!  It's alive OUTSIDE mommy!

Now you know where all the Christians get their morals.

WHERE DO YOU GET YOURS to make such a statement "Experimentation on live
aborted fetuses is wrong . . ."  What's a matter Ken, can't stand the sight
of little bodies squirming under the knife?  Himmler had the same problem.
His ideas worked great at headquarters but he threw up at the killing site.
Weak sister.

Oh dear, I'm raving again.  Must have read the Bible last night.

But please, tell us WHY it's wrong.

Keep chargin'

Ken Arndt