Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!sophie
From: sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Who's Life Anyway?
Message-ID: <1018@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Jun-85 17:41:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1018
Posted: Sun Jun 16 17:41:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Jun-85 19:14:23 EDT
References: <567@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 17

> But what if in any case your life was the life
> in question? Obviosly you wouldn't be alive (at least physically), but
> your freedom to live and enjoy life the way it was ment to be would have
> been altered and decided by another human being!                     

The logic in the above paragraph is a bit weird.  Assuming that it made sense,
here are a few remarks:

What do you mean by "the way it was meant"?  If you want to introduce religion
in this whole business, I suggest you conduct your conversations in net.religion
rather than here.

Do you actually believe that (non-aborted) people's freedom to enjoy life is
not altered by other people?
-- 
Sophie Quigley
{allegra|decvax|ihnp4|linus|watmath}!utzoo!mnetor!sophie