Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site abnji.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!mhuxv!abnji!jeff From: jeff@abnji.UUCP (jeff) Newsgroups: net.analog Subject: re: Electronics wearing out Message-ID: <692@abnji.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 09:28:47 EDT Article-I.D.: abnji.692 Posted: Fri Jun 14 09:28:47 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Jun-85 07:47:08 EDT Lines: 43 Keywords: reality, efficiencies, EPROMS, EEPROMS [Resistance Is Useless!!! (if less than 1 ohm) ] The concept of electronics lasting forever is in the same thinking that gives us never-dulling razor blades, 1000mpg, etc. Reality creeps in everywhere, even in semiconductor devices. You see, the devices aren't 100% efficient. That's why they generate heat. If you use a device anywhere near its capacity, it will simply wear out. A usual tradeoff is speed & efficiency vs power & lifespan. Underrating components will seem to make them last longer, but usually will increase the cost immensely (ie a 5W transistor used for 4W won't last as long as a 100W transistor used for 4W, but doesn't cost as much either. The 100W transistor might be too inefficient for use in the 4W circuit due to increased losses!). Even Consumer's Reports show that those 'bulb savers' cause a 100W bulb to consume 60W of power but give the equivalent of 40W of light although they last longer. The tradeoff is that your manual labor to replace the bulb may be worth the inefficiencies. In computers, speed is of the essence. Many critical components are used to their maximum performance, such as using TTL components to their maximum fanout (some EEs even exceed the current rating with full knowledge that the device will need occasional replacing but the performance is worth it). I remember that EPROMS and EEPROMS (aka EAPROMS) have a finite number of cycles before the layer that is supposed to be an insulator looses its insulating property. You see, we want to move electrons through the top layer when programming so it acts as a poor conductor but all the rest of the time we want an insulator that won't allow the electrons to wander around. EPROMS use UV light to scatter the electrons and give them the energy to penetrate the top layer and fill all the cells. Those UV lights are rather strong, so the top layer (I forgot the technical term for that layer)can be rather strong and lasts a long time. EEPROMS need to be faster to program and react to an electrical signal to provide erasure/programming. This means a weaker layer and a lower number of erase cycles (~10,000). This is far from forever! Jeff 'definitely an EE for today' Skot at the unmistakable ATT IS Atrium, Somerset NJ {ihnp4 | mcnc | cbosgb} abnji ! jeff