Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peregrine.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!pesnta!pertec!peregrine!mike
From: mike@peregrine.UUCP (Mike Wexler)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.micro
Subject: Re: Re: Re: 286 vs. 68k
Message-ID: <127@peregrine.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Jun-85 15:18:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: peregrin.127
Posted: Mon Jun 10 15:18:48 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Jun-85 08:36:28 EDT
References: <675@dataio.UUCP> <175@stl.UUCP>
Organization: Peregrine Systems, Irvine, Ca
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.arch:1358 net.micro:10730

> 
> In article <675@dataio.UUCP> bjorn@dataio.UUCP (Bjorn Benson) writes:
> >Enough is enough!!!
> >
> >I propose that we start a new newsgroup "net.micro.68vs286" so that
> >all you people who enjoy discussing benchmarks, registers, segments,
> >...
> 
> I vote YES.  I will not subscribe to it (even tho' I am actually interested
> and even professionally involved in the issue the discussion on the net
> has reached the mega-junk stage where info/flame ratio is too low to be worth
> reading).  But IFF we can have the debate restricted to such a group - 
> THEN I'll not have to unsubscribe to net.arch - which ought to be far more 
> useful if there is less in it.

How about creating a moderated group?

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Wexler(trwrb!pertec!peregrine!mike) |  Flame the BOZOs!  :-)
15530 Rockfield, Building C              |  This space is not for rent.
Irvine, Ca 92718         (714)855-3923   |  This space might be. :-)