Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re: Spring cleaning Preamps (actually CD vs LP)
Message-ID: <11220@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 4-Jun-85 16:51:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.11220
Posted: Tue Jun  4 16:51:05 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 06:46:08 EDT
References: <141@utflis.UUCP> <301@moncol.UUCP> <494@edison.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 18

> 
> That's crap, Ron, this newsgroup has already been over the problems
> with using masters indended for discs with CD's.  Your snide,
> offensive, and totally off the wall comments about
> craftmanship are just that, snide, offensive, and off the
> wall.  There are a lot of badly recorded CD's.  That's
> not a problem with the medium, it's a problem with the
> recording engineers who have the same additude you do,
> and thus dont' try to make the recordings right.
> 
And if you would read the message to which you are responding you will
see that I was talking aboiut CD PLAYERS and TURNTABLES not how masters
tapes and the media are recorded.

Plain and simple:  It's cheaper to mass produce a good CD player than
it is a good turntable.

-Ron