Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihlpg!sed408 From: sed408@ihlpg.UUCP (s. dugan) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper. Message-ID: <553@ihlpg.UUCP> Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 16:19:29 EDT Article-I.D.: ihlpg.553 Posted: Mon Jun 3 16:19:29 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 5-Jun-85 00:46:24 EDT References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <858@mnetor.UUCP> <1814@ukma.UUCP> <338@philabs.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 34 Xref: watmath net.flame:10277 net.women:5507 > Yes, it is easier for men to do it standing up. And, incidentally, > that's why they put flies in our pants (no pun intended). Why should > we go through the trouble of opening our trousers, dropping them and our > shorts to urinate. What should also be customary, however, is the > installation of urinals in all bathroom, commercial and residential. > That way nobody would have anything to complain about. > > As far as women using paper to *gift wrap* their sanitary napkins, > why don't the makers of these things include convenient little bags > to dispose of them in? Like the above, doesn't this must make sense? One brand does include little plastic bags with pretty little purple and white designs on them. > > There are also things far worse than the consumption of toilet paper > by women, required by the unfortunate state of affairs that women > endure. My pet peeve is probably plastic disposable tampon applicators. > These little nasties inevitably get flushed down toilets and end up > on South Shore beaches. Disgusting! These things should be outlawed. > I have nothing against women or their biological functioning, but > what's wrong with paper applicators that disintegrate? > > Brian Day > > UUCP: philabs!vip Those things shouldn't be flushed down the toilet in the first place. (The plastic ones OR the paper (cardboard) ones. -- Sarah E. Dugan (no clever lines)