Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-miles!chabot
From: chabot@miles.DEC (High Anxiety Workstations)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: now is the time for all good men...
Message-ID: <2497@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Jun-85 09:52:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2497
Posted: Wed Jun  5 09:52:36 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 06:57:03 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.flame:10313 net.women:5547

Cheryl Stewart
> Your first mistake, beth, JB, giant, or whatever it is you call yourself, was
> to stoop to a snide, name-calling tack.  If you want to discuss this topic
> man-to-man, grow up.  You can save your childish backbiting for sorority-house
> meetings or wherever it is that kind of thing is deemed acceptable.  

Gee, Cheryl, why "sorority"?  Why not "fraternity"?  Are sororities somehow
inherently childish?  But not fraternities?  Or what?  Why the deliberate use
of a female organization, hmm?  After all, I thought you thought the default
or rather ideal was male.

It's also a mistake to retaliate in kind (psst: I mean name-calling).

It's always a mistake to post to net.flame! :-)

L S Chabot   ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot   chabot%amber.dec@decwrl.arpa

PS: I agree with Beth--why don't you come up with a really new idea instead of
declaring the status quo new?  ---lsc