Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!columbia!topaz!quint
From: quint@topaz.ARPA (Amqueue)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <2226@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 6-Jun-85 18:30:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.2226
Posted: Thu Jun  6 18:30:28 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Jun-85 01:22:14 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <858@mnetor.UUCP> <258@ihlpa.UUCP> <5804@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Reply-To: quint@topaz.UUCP (Amqueue)
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.flame:10379 net.women:5626


     Holy shit! I don't believe it! Here, right here, on net.flame, we 
have found the reason for male supremacy in the technical fields:

>................... Six guys can all use the same toilet at the same time.
>I'd like to see six girls do that....
>
>    Scott R. Turner

This is obviously the most efficient way to do it. And since men are,
by nature's own design, inherently more efficient, they are obviously
the most efficient people around. And Efficiency is one of the ghods of
the technical fields, correct? Since women are thereby less efficient, 
it is small wonder there are so few of them around in these types of 
jobs. We should all be proud of them for overcoming their inherent
handicap.

     There... have I gotten everything yet? toilets, dicrimination, handicaps,
being proud, poor little women, uh... yeah, I guess so.

oh, and scott? the word is cunt. slit. crack. Not cooze. 

cu!
have fun
Hugs!
/amqueue