Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!alex
From: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <5812@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 21:20:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5812
Posted: Mon Jun  3 21:20:49 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 01:04:51 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <858@mnetor.UUCP> <258@ihlpa.UUCP> <5804@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Reply-To: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP (Alex Quilici)
Followup-To: net.auto, net.motss
Distribution: net
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 25
Keywords: disgusting flames

Summary:

In article <5804@ucla-cs.ARPA> srt@ucla-cs.UUCP (Scott Turner) writes:
>In article <258@ihlpa.UUCP> zubbie@ihlpa.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck) writes:
>>...
>>Frankly I think it stems from fear of deflating ther male ego because
>>they would find out the silly *thing* really wont dip into the water.
>>
>>Jeanette L. Zobjeck
>
>It's a dick, Jeanette, a cock, penis, etc., not a *thing*.  I can understand
>that you've probably never seen one, you frigid bitch, but I'm certain you
>must have read about it.  You and Sophie ought to get together some night
>for a good squat and talk all about the male anatomy....
>
>    Scott R. Turner
>    STUDNET: srt@wang.stud

Wait, Scott, you're not being fair.  From what I've heard, hundreds of men,
several women and a couple of happy cucumbers can vouch from experience
that Jeanette and Sophie aren't frigid.  Maybe when they were at your
place, it was just that time of the month.

By the way, Jeanette, if you're ever in the LA area again, stop in at UCLA,
and we'll show you a silly *thing* or two that really does dip in the water.

Alex