Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!karen
From: karen@randvax.UUCP (Karen Isaacson)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper. (ROT26)
Message-ID: <2533@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Jun-85 12:27:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.2533
Posted: Thu Jun  6 12:27:03 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 20:41:15 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1559@amdahl.UUCP> <129@uw-june>
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 21

> > I suggest that net.flame should also use ROT13 if flames are likely
> > to be offensive due to their contents or language used.
> > Deepak S. Sabnis ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,nsc}!amdahl!dss00    (408) 746-6058
> 
> ROT13?  In net.flame?!?!  Look here, kid, offensive is what new.flame is
> all about.  *Everything* posted to net.flame is offensive, either because
> of the contents or because it's misposted.  If some idiot mama's boy (you)
> wanders in and gets his psyche scarred, that's his problem.  Read what
> net.announce.newusers has to say about net.flame, and if you can't stand
> the heat...
> Human:    Gordon Davisson

Then don't *also* post the same *crap* to net.women, etc.  I don't think
Deepak wandered into net.flame to read the junk, I think net.flame
wandered out & got him somewhere else.
-- 


		Karen Isaacson
		decvax!randvax!karen
		karen@rand-unix.arpa