Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!grkermi!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-edu1!rafferty From: rafferty@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: My God... did I *really* say *that*? Message-ID: <351@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA> Date: Sun, 9-Jun-85 00:30:58 EDT Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-e.351 Posted: Sun Jun 9 00:30:58 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Jun-85 04:01:18 EDT Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 33 [Ed Gould writes:] >>A basic requirement for AA to be fair is a *realistic* setting of >>percentage quotas ... >> (I call a realistic >>percentage the percentage that a "color-blind" and "gender-blind" >>employer would end up hiring by accident. I have a suspicion that AA >>fans favor higher quotas than this.) > >Certainly some of us do. The quotas should be high enough such that >we get to a state where the percentages are those that the "blind" >employer would hire if there were no discrimination *and there never had >been*. If there were enough role models for girls so that they would aspire >to these jobs, then your quota idea would probably be enough. But there >aren't nearly enough women who are "successful" enough to provide >those models. Until there are, then we neet to over-balance the scales. What utter bull! How can we say that we have to create role models for any kind of minorities? What we want is people hired in a non-discriminatory fashion. It does not follow that we have to push women into "male-oriented" jobs. Not that I'm saying that we should try to dissuade them, but if they don't want to take advantage of their potential, then that's their problem, and I shouldn't be held responsible for their stupidity. And when do we stop having these over-balancing quotas? Maybe we'll go too far some day soon, and we'll have to discriminate for white males, in order to overcome the prejudice against them. ---- Colin Rafferty { Math Department, Carnegie-Mellon University } "The pendulum swings back again."